Synthesis: what have we learned?
We marked our tenth anniversary in October 2014 and published a synthesis of the learning to date and the implications for policy and practice. Our own evidence base, in line with a substantial body of international research, demonstrates that economic, environmental and social factors all influence the health of individuals and communities.
The ten year synthesis outlined a set of interlinked issues – poverty, early life experience, neighbourhood environments and social contexts – are at the heart of inequality and consequently health inequality in Glasgow. Services, interventions and approaches to improve outcomes are woven through these issues and have their own effect. The wide-ranging actions required to improve life expectancy and reduce health inequalities were outlined in the ten year synthesis report and accompanying summary leaflet.
The key learning from the ten year synthesis was that actions need to be taken across all the areas outlined in the diagram in an integrated and sustained way. Nevertheless, it can be helpful to drill down into the evidence about particular areas to maximise learning and provide clarity about the areas for action.
During discussions about the ten year synthesis with GCPH partner organisations and networks it emerged that there was an interest in increasing understanding about the links between people’s health and their social contexts, and the related actions that can be taken to improve health.
Our review of social contexts evidence outlines the health impacts and key actions relating to people’s relationships and networks of support, interconnections within communities, and the involvement of people and communities in decisions that affect their lives.
Within the theme of urban environment, a synthesis of learning on active travel (walking or cycling all or part of a journey rather than using individual motorised transport) has been undertaken to highlight learning from this growing evidence base and the need for strong leadership to bring about the environmental and health gains from increasing active travel. This will be published in spring 2016.
An early years, children and young people synthesis is also currently being produced to outline our evidence on this critical life-stage and actions that can help to maximise the health of children and young people and their future health as adults.
Overall, our evidence base and a large body of international health evidence, emphasises the critical importance of addressing poverty. Poverty is the most ubiquitous and persistent risk factor for ill health; so a commitment to improving population health and to reducing health inequalities inherently means a commitment to reducing or eradicating poverty.
Much of the poor health of Scotland, and its largest city, Glasgow, are explained by experiences of deindustrialisation, deprivation and poverty. However, in addition, high levels of 'excess' mortality – that is, higher mortality over and above that explained by differences in socioeconomic deprivation – have been observed for Scotland compared with England & Wales, as well as for Glasgow compared with similar post-industrial UK cities.
Alongside NHS Health Scotland and other partners, we have undertaken a considerable amount of research into this excess, and a report published in May 2016 identified the most likely causes. In Glasgow’s case these related to a complex set of multiple, interwoven, factors. Key to these was the fact that the city’s population was made more vulnerable to important socioeconomic (poverty, deprivation, deindustrialisation) and political (detrimental economic policies) exposures, resulting in more adverse outcomes compared with other cities like Liverpool and Manchester.
This vulnerability was generated by a series of historical factors/processes including: the lagged effects of high, historical, levels of overcrowding; Scottish Office policy in post-war decades including the socially-selective relocation of population to outside the city; more detrimental processes of urban change resulting in relatively worse living conditions; and differences in local government responses to UK economic policy in the 1980s which conferred protective effects on comparator cities. Further resulting protective factors were identified e.g. greater social capital in Liverpool. A number of other contributory factors were highlighted, including the inadequate measurement of living in deprived circumstances in the city.
Download the full report, which includes a detailed set of policy recommendations aimed at national and local government, and the findings of which were endorsed by a range of experts in public health and other relevant disciplines.
We have also published a synthesis of our learning about what factors influence the health of babies, children and young people and how improving circumstances during this life stage can help improve health and tackle health inequalities.
This synthesis draws on ten plus years of outputs and events from the GCPH and GoWell to outline compelling evidence about the importance of early years’ and childhood experiences for healthy development and for health and wellbeing throughout the life course. The report outlines evidence about the different ‘spheres’ of influence impacting on children’s health and wellbeing:
- Family and parent environment – Fundamental to healthy child development and attachment is the family/household environment, the health and wellbeing of the child’s parents (or main carers) and crucially, consistent love and care.
- Learning environment – Early years settings and schools exert critical influences on children’s development and future outcomes.
- Neighbourhood environment – The neighbourhoods in which children and young people live and socialise have significant impacts on their day-to-day lives and their health and wellbeing.
- Socioeconomic context – The health and wellbeing of children is directly influenced by material circumstances. Socioeconomic factors interact with and impact across children’s family, learning and neighbourhood environments.
Interacting with all of these, and having their own effect, are the services, interventions and approaches undertaken to improve outcomes for individuals and communities. This review increases understanding of how the whole of society, as well as effective universal services and targeted interventions, can support and nurture all children during this critical life stage. A number of consistent and important themes emerge from the evidence:
- Emotional attachment - Strong bonds and positive relationships within families, in schools and in neighbourhoods are crucial to children’s healthy development and underpin their future development of good relationships and good parenting.
- Safety - Not feeling safe at home can have damaging long-lasting impacts for children into adulthood; levels of safety and cohesion in schools impact on health and wellbeing; and use and enjoyment of neighbourhoods is affected by experiences and perceptions of safety.
- Healing approaches - A lack of attachment and stressful experiences impact negatively on physical and emotional development, with potentially life-long consequences. However, there is also significant capacity for healing through changing circumstances, nurturing approaches, and supporting resilience through family support, schools, communities and services.
- Understanding different circumstances - There is a need for approaches and service delivery to understand and respond to differences in personal circumstances. In particular, to prevent and mitigate against the impacts of poverty and inequalities.
- Involvement in decision-making - Children and young people need to be involved in decisions affecting their lives within their family environments, schools and neighbourhoods. Meaningful involvement is required which influences outcomes.
In addition to our syntheses reports we also respond to public consultations and calls for evidence where relevant. These are an opportunity to synthesise our research to inform and influence decisions at both a local and national level.